Apple Sues OpenAI Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft
Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and two former employees, alleging they misappropriated confidential trade secrets related to the iPhone maker's hardware business to accelerate OpenAI's push into artificial intelligence (AI)-powered consumer devices. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, marks a sharp escalation in tensions between the two companies, which partnered in 2024 to integrate ChatGPT into Apple's ecosystem before emerging as competitors in AI hardware.Apple has named OpenAI, former Apple executives Tang Tan and Chang Liu, and io Products, the hardware startup co-founded by former Apple design chief Jony Ive and later acquired by OpenAI, as defendants. The company alleges the former employees retained and shared proprietary information covering product designs, engineering processes and supplier relationships to support OpenAI's hardware ambitions.
Allegations Of Misconduct
According to the complaint, Apple claims OpenAI encouraged former employees to disclose confidential information during recruitment and onboarding. The lawsuit further alleges that some interviews were used to gather commercially sensitive details about Apple's unreleased products and hardware roadmap. Apple is seeking damages and a court order preventing the use of its trade secrets.
OpenAI has denied the allegations, stating that it has no interest in competitors' trade secrets and that its hardware programme has been developed independently. The company said it would vigorously defend itself against the claims.
The legal dispute comes as OpenAI expands beyond software into consumer hardware following its acquisition of io Products, a startup founded by Ive after leaving Apple. The acquisition strengthened OpenAI's ambitions to develop AI-native devices capable of competing with smartphones and other personal electronics.
The lawsuit also reflects intensifying competition among technology companies seeking leadership in AI hardware, where intellectual property, chip design and product engineering have become strategic assets. The outcome of the case could influence hiring practices, trade secret protection and competitive dynamics across the rapidly evolving AI device market.
Pages:
[1]