In the context of Indian local products, the coding system where \“gamble\“ is coded as \“fblckf\“ follows a specific pattern. This pattern involves shifting each letter by a fixed number of positions in the alphabet. For example, if we analyze \“gamble\“ to \“fblckf\“, we can deduce the coding mechanism.
Applying the same coding logic to the word \“flower\“, we need to determine the equivalent coded version. Based on the pattern observed in \“gamble\“ to \“fblckf\“, each letter is shifted backward by one position in the alphabet. Thus, \“f\“ corresponds to \“g\“, \“b\“ to \“a\“, \“l\“ to \“m\“, \“c\“ to \“d\“, \“k\“ to \“l\“, and \“f\“ to \“g\“.
Therefore, for \“flower\“, which consists of the letters f, l, o, w, e, r, we apply the same backward shift: f becomes e, l becomes k, o becomes n, w becomes v, e becomes d, and r becomes q. So, \“flower\“ is coded as \“eknvdq\“. This coding method is reminiscent of simple cipher techniques used in various Indian traditional systems for encoding messages or product names. |
